It is description for the different sorts of paper at COLING 2018

It is description for the different sorts of paper at COLING 2018

It is essential to find the paper that is right to be able to help get high quality reviews for the work. Keep in mind that all paper kinds utilize the template that is same download your message and LaTeX templates right right right here: coling2018.zip

Computationally-aided analysis that is linguistic

The main focus of the paper kind is brand new insight that is linguistic. It could take the type of an empirical research of some linguistic trend, or of a theoretical outcome of a linguistically-relevant formal system.

  1. Relevance: Is this paper highly relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: Through the real means the paper is written, could you inform just just what research concern ended up being addressed, the thing that was done and just why, and just how the outcomes connect with the investigation concern?
  3. Originality: How initial and innovative may be the extensive research described? Originality might be into the question that is linguistic addressed, within the methodology put on the linguistic concern, or perhaps in the mixture of this two.
  4. Technical correctness/soundness: may be the extensive research described in the paper technically sound and proper? Is one able to trust the claims associated with the paper—are they sustained by the analysis or experiments consequently they are the results precisely interpreted?
  5. Reproducibility: can there be detail that is sufficient some body in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcome? n/a for several kinds of theoretical results
  6. Data/code access: could be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the study community or perhaps is here a reason that is compelling why this isn’t feasible?
  7. Generalizability: Does the paper show exactly just just how the outcomes generalize, either by deepening our knowledge of some system that is linguistic general or by demonstrating methodology which can be placed on other dilemmbecause as well? n/a for many kinds of theoretical results
  8. Significant comparison: Does the paper clearly put the described use respect to current literary works? Will it be clear both what exactly is novel when you look at the research presented and just how it builds on earlier in the day work?
  9. Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for a paper that is full-length or wouldn’t it reap the benefits of further development?
  10. General suggestion: there are numerous submissions that are good for slots at COLING 2018; essential can it be to feature that one? Will people discover great deal by scanning this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is much better to change from other reviewers rather than grade every thing at the center.

NLP engineering test paper

This paper kind fits the majority of submissions at present CL and NLP conferences.

  1. Relevance: Is this paper highly relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: Through the means the paper is written, are you able to inform just just exactly what research question had been addressed, the thing that was done and just why, and exactly how the outcome connect with the investigation concern?
    1. Can it be clear what the authors’ hypothesis is? What exactly is it? A text input reponse
    2. Can it be clear the way the writers have actually tested their theory? y/n
  3. Originality: How initial and innovative could be the extensive research described? Keep in mind that originality could include a fresh method or a unique task, or it may lie within the careful analysis of what goes on whenever an understood strategy is placed on a known task (in which the pairing is novel) or into the careful analysis of what are the results each time a understood strategy is placed on a understood task in a brand new language.
  4. Technical correctness/soundness: could be the extensive research described in the paper theoretically sound and proper? Is one able to trust the claims associated with the paper—are they sustained by the analysis or experiments and are also the results precisely interpreted?
    1. Could it be clear the way the total outcomes confirm/refute the theory, or would be the outcomes inconclusive?
    2. Perform some writers explain the way the outcomes follow from their theory (as opposed to state, other feasible confounding element)?
    3. Will be the datasets utilized clearly described and so are they suitable for testing the hypothesis as mentioned?
  5. Reproducibility: can there be detail that is sufficient some body in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcome?
  6. Data/code access: could be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the investigation community or perhaps is here a compelling explanation provided why it is not feasible?
  7. Error analysis: Does the paper provide an error that is thoughtful, which searches for linguistic habits into the kinds of mistakes created by the system(s) examined and sheds light on either avenues for future work or even the way to obtain the strengths/weaknesses associated with the systems?
  8. Significant contrast: Does the paper clearly destination the described make use of respect to literature that is existing? Could it be clear both what’s novel within the research presented and just how it develops on previous work?
  9. Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for the paper that have a glimpse at the website is full-length or would it not take advantage of further work?
  10. General suggestion: there are lots of good submissions contending for slots at COLING 2018; essential can it be to feature that one? Will people discover a complete great deal by scanning this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is way better to change from other reviewers rather than grade everything at the center.

Posted in Developmental Psychology Research Paper Topics.

Добавить комментарий